Author: Patricia Silvina Knass - Romer Labs Diagnostic
GmbH
Mycotoxins are fungal metabolites frequently associated with
grains, cereals, and other human and animal foods obtained from
these sources. However, based on the latest studies and recently
implemented norms, other products associated with mycotoxins
contamination have begun to be taken into account, especially
regarding toxins which are considered a human risk, as is the
case with Ochratoxin A (OTA). Ochratoxin A is produced by
various species of Aspergillus and Penicillium. Several aspects
distinguish this mycotoxin from the others. Chemically, it is
the only mycotoxin that has a Chlorine- atom as a substitute.
From a toxicological point of view, it is considered
nephrotoxic, teratogenic and immunotoxic, as well as a possible
human carcinogen (Group 2B – IARC).1
In temperate and cold climates, OTA is mainly produced by
Penicillium verrucosum or P. nordicum. In tropical and
subtropical regions, the main OTA producing mould is Aspergillus
ochraceus, although the production of this toxin in warm regions
has also been associated to two other Aspergillus sp: A. niger
var niger and A. carbonarius. 2
The great variety of foods in which OTA has been detected ranges
from cereals and oleaginous crops, to coffee, dried fruits,
wines, cheese, processed meat, smoked or salted fish and even
medicinal herbs. As the sources of exposure are so diverse, the
presence of OTA has been recorded in most of the studied
population.
The half-life of orally ingested OTA in human plasma is
approximately 35 days, based on data inferred from experimental
monkeys. This information has led to several studies evaluating
the degree of exposure in a normal diet. In 1998, a Tolerable
Daily Intake (TDI) of up to 5 ng/kg b.w./day was recommended
based on results by SCOOP (Scientific Cooperation on Question
relating to Food – European Comission).
Ideally, however, daily intake should not exceed 1.2 to 1.4 ng/kg
b.w./day. 2,4,5
Ochratoxin A in beverages for
human consumption
The number of reports and studies regarding Ochratoxin A has
increased since 1995, especially since the first study carried
out in order to establish the level of OTA intake by the
population of EC State Members. Although this study was based on
a limited amount of data obtained, it proved very useful as a
tool for basic information and future decisions. Since this
initial report, numerous others have been published evaluating
the frequency of OTA occurrence, OTA levels in biological fluids
such as blood, plasma, urine, breast milk, as well as its
occurrence in new sources of exposure (raisins, wine and
spices). 4
The report by SCOOP Task 3.2.7 (2002), which compiled on the
dietary intake of OTA by the EU population, describes the
contribution of each type of food to the mean European OTA
intake, and shows that even though cereals contribute to 44% of
the total amount of OTA consumed by the EU population, the
contribution provided by beverages amounts to the following:
- - wines 10 %
- - coffee 9 %
- - beer 7 %
OTA intake through breast milk is considered in a separate
section, but only with data from four countries.
Based on this report, new maximum limits of OTA were established
for different products. (seeTable 1).
Occurrence of OTA in beverages.
Beer: Although this
beverage is not directly included in the European regulation -as
mycotoxin controls are performed on cereals, it is considered
that the quality of the end product can be determined-, some
countries consider beer as a product derived from cereals, which
corresponds to a maximum tolerance level of 3.0 μg/kg. However,
Italy proposes a maximum tolerance level of 0.2 μg/kg.
In view of the global importance of beer consumption, there have
been many reports investigating the levels of OTA in different
countries, but information on OTA intake through beer was only
gathered in the EU.
Table 2 shows OTA levels reported in different beverages, taking
into consideration the areas in which occurrence was registered.
It shows that, with the exception of a report from South Africa,
the concentrations of OTA found in beer are considerably low.6
Table 3 shows the contribution of different beverages to the
daily intake of OTA in European countries.
Wine: European
legislation and the OIV (Office International de la Vigne et du
Vin) recommend an OTA tolerance level of no more than 2.0 μg/kg
for all types of wine: white, red, rosé, sparkling, etc.

As is the case of beer, wine is only drunk by certain consumer
groups, and it is important to consider this when evaluating OTA
intake through these beverages.4
A revision of published reports evidences a clear relation
between the type of fermentation and the presence of OTA in
wines. As a general rule, white wines usually have lower OTA
levels than rosé wines, which in turn have lower levels than red
wines. This evidences a clear relationship between the process
of maceration and OTA solubilization in the grape must. On the
other hand, sweet wines elaborated with a process that involves
partial dehydration in the sun tend to have higher OTA levels
compared to dry wines. 7, 8 The occurrence of OTA in
wines also varies according to the region (see Table 2).
Table 1: Summary of the European
regulation for OTA levels in beverages.
|
| Product |
Level (μg/kg. = ppb) |
Document |
| Dietary foods for special medical purposes for children |
0.5 |
EC 683/2004 O. J. L 106 –
15/04/04 |
| Roasted coffee beans and ground coffee made from roasted
beans with the exception of soluble coffee. |
0.5 |
EC 123/2005
O. J. L 25 – 28/01/05 |
| Soluble coffee (instant coffee) |
10.0 |
| Wine (white, red, rosé) and other wines, or grape
must-based beverages |
2.0 |
| Grape juice, grape juice ingredients in other beverages
including grape nectar and concentrated grape juice as
reconstituted. |
2.0 |
| Grape must and concentrated grape must as reconstituted,
intended for direct human consumption. |
2.0 |
| Beer and cocoa. |
Still under discussion |
Table 2: OTA occurrence in
beverages.4,6,9,10
|
| Beverage |
Region |
N –
(% positive)
(N: number of samples tested) |
Mean OTA
concentration |
| Beer |
Europe |
496 – (36
%) |
0.032 μg/L |
| Beer |
South Africa |
29 – (45 %) |
3 – 2340 μg/L |
| Beer |
Canada |
41 – (63 %) |
0.061 μg/L |
| Beer |
Germany |
250 – (75
%) |
0.01 – 0.29
μg/L |
| Wine |
Southern Europe |
625 - (72,3
%) |
0,636 μg/L |
| Wine |
Northern Europe |
835 – (50,3
%) |
0,181 μg/L |
| Wine |
Italy |
184 – (86
%) |
1.565 μg/L |
| Wine |
Argentina-Chile |
84 – (-) |
<0.008 μg/L |
| Green coffee |
Europe |
1704 – (36 %) |
3.641 μg/L |
| Processed coffee |
Europe |
1205 – (47,3%) |
1.092 μg/L |
Table 3: Contribution of beverages
to the daily OTA intake of the European population.4
|
|
Beverage |
Region |
Contribution to daily OTA intake
(ng/kg pc/day) |
| Beer |
Europe |
0.01
(Italy), - 0.14 (Denmark) |
| Wine |
Europe (all the population) |
0.02
(Portugal), - 0.86 (Italy) |
| Wine |
Europe (consumers) |
0.003 (France,
children), - 2.94 (Italy) |
| Coffee |
Europe (all
the population) |
0.06
(Italy), - 0.42 (Finland) |
Coffee: OTA
contamination in coffee is assessed at two stages: green coffee
and processed coffee. Several authors have reported that the
contamination in green coffee values between 0.2 and 360 μg/kg.11
The results shown in the Task report 3.2.7 for green and
processed coffee are summarized in Table 2. No significant
differences were found between the mean values of processed
coffee when the geographical location of each country (North and
South) was considered. However, OTA values were significantly
higher in the green coffee of southern countries, especially
Greece and France (16.14 μg/kg and 6.55 μg/kg respectively).
This decrease observed in processed coffee evidently amounts to
the fact that the processes used in southern countries are much
more drastic than those applied in northern countries, as well
as to the commercially available mixtures of coffee varieties.
The main factors that influence OTA contamination in the coffee
production chain are failures in agricultural and in
manufacturing practices. FAO, together with other international
organizations related to coffee, has initiated a global program
to reduce the level of this toxin in coffee (http://www.coffee-ota.org/),
which will mainly be applied in coffee producing countries.12
Romer Labs® solutions for the detection of OTA in beverages
Romer Labs®, offers solutions for OTA detection in beverages
that can be applied to all types of analytical and industrial
needs: immunoaffinity columns, solid phase columns, liquid
calibrators and ELISA tests.
OchraStarTM:
Immunoaffinity columns were developed to clean-up complex
matrices and to obtain lower detection levels. Besides using the
classical methods applicable to beers, wines and other liquid
matrices, Romer Labs® has developed a specific technique to
detect OTA in roasted coffee using HPLC-FLD.
MycoSep®/MultiSep® 229 Ochra:
Romer Labs® single step columns reduce the clean-up time to just
30 seconds, thus providing a solution for the analysis of large
amounts of samples, highly useful at an industrial scale. For
green coffee samples, the MycoSep® 229 column provided a
recovery of 98% for levels ranging between 2.6 and 91 μg/kg,
whereas for red wine the recovery was 97 % in the same range.13
Biopure: Ready-to-use
liquid calibrators are recommended for best analysis
performance. These are backed by the relevant Certificates of
Analysis indicating, amongst other details, the certified value
with its associated uncertainty. Biopure also offers certified
pure crystalline Ochratoxin A.

AgraQuant® Ochratoxin ELISA
test kit: To determine the level of OTA in different
matrices, including beverages, Romer Labs® has also developed a
direct competitive ELISA test, which covers the necessary range
for achieving fast and reliable assessments. The kit is also
validated for green coffee, red wine (with a specific
application according to the content of ethanol of the wine) and
beer. This method provides rapid low cost results, especially
when applied to the monitoring system recommended by HACCP
programs for the various agroalimentary chains.14
| Conclusions: |
| Greater demands by markets and
regulators compel the beverage industry to incorporate new
determinations, such as OTAdetection and quantification. It
has become necessary to establish fast and reliable methods
that can be applied industrially, as well as to validate
them for the quantification of OTA in beverages. Romer Labs®
offers the widest range of analytical alternatives and its
experts provide advice on choosing the best analytical
option for OTA detection in beverages. |
References
1 Murphi P., Hendrich S., Landgren C., Bryant C.
Food Mycotoxins: An Update. J. Food Scie. Vol. 71, Nr. 5, 2006
– R51-R65.
2 Ringot D., Chango B., Schneider Y-J., Larondelle
Y. Toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics of ochratoxin A, an
update. Chemico-Biological Interactions 159, 2006, 18-46
3 Marquardt R. R., Frohlich A. A. A review of
recent advances in understanding ochratoxicosis. J. An. Scie.
70, 1992, 3968-3988.
4 SCOOP – Task 3.2.7 Assessment of dietary intake
of Ochratoxin A by the population of EU Member States. 2002 .
5 JECFA 47. WHO FOOD ADDITIVES SERIES: 47 Safety
evaluation of certain mycotoxins in food - Ochratoxin. 2001
World Health Organization, Geneva, 2001IPCS
6 Odhav B., Naicker V. Mycotoxin in South African
traditionally brewed beer. Food Add. Cont. 19 (vol1) – 2002-
pp 55-61
7 Zamora Marín F. La Ocratoxina A; un problema
emergente. h t t p: // www. enologo.com /tecnicos/ eno34/
eno34.html
8 Gambuti A., Strollo D., Genovese A., Ugliano M.,
Ritieni A., Moio L. Influence of Enological Practices on
Ochratoxin A Concentration in Wine. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 56,2
(2005) 158-162
9 Ratola N., Martins L., Alves A. Ochratoxin A in
wines-assessing global uncertainty associated with the
results. Analytica Chimica Acta 513 (2004) 319–324.
10 Pacin A., Resnik S., Vega M., Saelzer R.,
Ciancio Bovier E., Rios G., Martinez N., Occurrence of
ochratoxin A in wines in the Argentinian and Chilean markets.
ARKIVOC 2005 (xii) 214-223.
11 Taniwaki M., Pitt J., Teixeira A., Iamanaka B.
The source of ochratoxin A in Brazilian coffee and its
formation in relation to processing methods. Int. J. Food Micr.
82 (2003) 173– 179
12 Paulino de Moraes M.H., Luchese R.H. Ochratoxin
A on Green Coffee: Influence of Harvest and Drying Processing
Procedures. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 5824-5828
13 Buttinger G., Fuchs E., Knapp H., Berthiller F.,
Schuhmacher R., Binder EM., Krska R. Performance of new
cleanup column for the determination of ochratoxin A in
cereals and foodstuffs by HPLC-FLD. Food Add. Cont. Vol 21, Nº
11 (November 2004) pp 1107-1114.
14 Zheng Z., Hanneken J., Houchins D., King R., Lee
P., Richard J. Validation of an ELISA test kit for the
detection of ochratoxin A in several food commodities by
comparison with HPLC. Mycopathologia (2005) 159: 265–272
Author: Patricia Silvina KNASS (Bqca.), is a
Technical Advisor in Latin America for Romers Labs Diagnostic
GmbH. Her education began at the National University of Misiones
(Argentina), in the field of Biochemistry. Her master thesis
title is Critical Control Point Identification for Aflatoxin
and Ochratoxin in two different swine farms in Argentina
(work in progress). She worked as a Technical Advisor in Latin
America; was the General Manager for agriNEA (Argentina);
researcher at the Mycotoxin Laboratory of the National
University of Misiones (Argentina). She’s currently working for
Romer Labs (Austria).
Author: Patricia Silvina Knass - Romer Labs Diagnostic
GmbH
|